The Foothill Dragon Press

Why college athletes should not be paid

Credit%3A+Jessie+Snyder+%2F+The+Foothill+Dragon+Press
Back to Article
Back to Article

Why college athletes should not be paid

Credit: Jessie Snyder / The Foothill Dragon Press

Credit: Jessie Snyder / The Foothill Dragon Press

Credit: Jessie Snyder / The Foothill Dragon Press

Credit: Jessie Snyder / The Foothill Dragon Press

Nick Zoll

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






21st century college athletics have grown extremely popular among sports fans, garnering more national attention than ever before. Events such as March Madness and the College Football Playoff have helped the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) become a successful industry. In fact, the yearly revenue of the NCAA is estimated to be just short of $1 billion.

It is no secret that the student athletes are one of the main catalysts for the prosperity of the college sports industry. After all, these individuals participate in rigorous training in order to benefit the NCAA, which raises a debatable question among many. If these athletes put their blood, sweat and tears into their respective sports, should they be rewarded with a portion of the NCAA’s profit?

Even though I am opposed to the idea of paying college athletes, it is still worthy of examination. However, the argument has many flaws and appears illogical from a variety of different standpoints.

First of all, it seems completely unreasonable and near impossible to pay every student athlete, considering that there are a total of 20 sports combined between men and women in Division I. Even if it were possible to achieve this, how would the NCAA decide to distribute the money? Would athletes of different sports receive the same amount? Due to the number of variables, an attempt to accomplish this goal would only create more conflict.

The incentives that come with playing college athletics are extremely beneficial. When considering the privileges of a college athlete, a small paycheck is essentially pointless in the long run.

For example, the extremely talented and successful players create a name for themselves among the media and the sports world. In a way, fame eventually correlates to money for these athletes. Once they leave college, a select group of high-profile athletes are offered the opportunity to play professionally, whether it be in the United States or overseas.

A prime example of this is Deshaun Watson, a quarterback who led Clemson University’s football team to a Division I national championship this year. He did not receive an extra payment for his accomplishments, but instead he will be rewarded in this year’s upcoming NFL Draft, where he is projected to be a top 10 pick. Watson will likely sign a multi-million dollar contract with his respective team to begin his career, and may see the opportunity to earn even more money if he rises to stardom. In addition, Watson has cemented a legacy for himself at Clemson, which would have never been possible without his participation in college sports.

Possibly the greatest benefit of all, the NCAA provides a select group with sports scholarships. Although the number of scholarships given are small (only two percent of college athletes receive them), each one makes an impact on the athlete’s life. A student who may not have been able to afford college would be able to attend due to their athletic abilities.

The argument for paying college athletes tends to fall apart when scholarships are mentioned. Anyways, isn’t a scholarship essentially a paycheck to attend college? A little extra money isn’t really necessary when you already have a part of your expensive education paid for, not even mentioning those with full ride scholarships.

Now consider the college athletes that don’t receive national attention. Most of these individuals play without a scholarship and have to pay full expenses to their respective schools. I’m sure they would push towards the idea of supplying collegiate athletes with a bit of profit, however it clearly isn’t possible. But if they don’t receive any money from playing college sports or at the professional level, then why would they choose to dedicate so much of their time to this?

The answer is simple: these athletes don’t focus on the monetary aspect. Instead, they focus on more important things. They play college sports to experience the camaraderie of being part of a team. They learn valuable lessons about life, such as being humble in winning and being gracious in losing. Most of all, they play for the love of the game and the joy that comes with it.

If you haven’t yet realized, today’s world of sports revolves around money. In professional sports, the ultimate goal of winning a championship has been replaced with the determination to sign a massive contract and acquire as much money as possible. If college athletes were to be paid, their passion for the game may remain the same but their motives would change.

For now, let’s put the logistics of the matter to the side and focus on the morals. By paying these college athletes, we are teaching them that collegiate level sports are more than just an extracurricular activity.

Without question, that alters the competition of college athletics drastically. Of course, there are people with reasonable arguments as to why it would benefit the athletes. Couldn’t these college students benefit from a little extra money? Undeniably they could use it.

However, we would be teaching these amateur athletes to focus more on an extracurricular activity where they would earn money. In college, it is essential to channel most of your energy into schooling, which builds upon your future potential as a student. This yields job opportunities and the chance to be successful, not simply by coincidence.

To the enthusiastic and diehard sports fans everywhere: consider the future of these young men and women before pushing for something that could become an irreversible movement.

Most importantly, to the collegiate athletes in favor of this concept: be careful what you wish for.

What do you think?
About the Writer
6 Comments

6 Responses to “Why college athletes should not be paid”

  1. Jerry Conway on November 29th, 2017 8:50 am

    fat people are my idols

     
  2. Ralph Jprdan on February 9th, 2018 7:25 am

    Jerry Conway is my idol.

     
  3. dingle on April 19th, 2018 10:50 am

    Jerry Conway and Ralph Jprdan are my idols.

     
  4. Garrett Walker on December 6th, 2018 4:48 pm

    This is a very well written article and you make a lot of valid arguments. I played football for 11 years and grew up around college athletics so this subject hit home for me. Many would agree with your claim that it would be near impossible to pay every student athlete, including myself. While the NCAA is a billion-dollar industry, not all schools have the same success, and not all sports programs bring in large amounts of revenue. Although the question of how we would pay the athletes is a big debate, there have been lots of different ideas. David A. Grenardo, a Professor of Law with a background in teaching Sports Law at St. Mary’s University School of Law, suggests “The Duke Model”. In his writing published in the Brooklyn Law Review in the Fall of 2017 titled “The Duke Model: A Performance-based Solution for Compensating College Athletes” Grenardo suggests a model for paying only Football and Men’s basketball athletes, because they bring in the majority of the revenue. Grenardo offers a model that would compensate student athletes based on how well they perform both on and off the field. You say it is essential for athletes to channel most of their energy into schooling, and I completely agree. I mean after all that is the real reason why people go to college right? The value of a scholarship and good education is undeniable. Athletes fortunate enough to receive scholarships will reap the benefits of the education they receive for the rest of their lives. I would argue that incorporating a system where athletes could be compensated for both academic and athletic achievements, would create extra incentive for athletes to succeed at the highest level both on field and in the classroom. With extra incentives for athletes to succeed, the level of competition would increase. More and more kids would work towards the opportunity to play sports in college. Not only would competition increase on the field, it would increase in the classroom. You claim that the ultimate goal of winning a championship would be replaced with desire for the biggest contract, but I would argue that for many athletes, winning a championship was never the ultimate goal. Many athletes use their athletic ability as a means to an education.

     
  5. Tanazia Knox on January 15th, 2019 12:50 pm

    IT’S A Very GOOD STORY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     
  6. not telling on January 16th, 2019 11:20 am

    Kareem Abdul-Jabbar a famous NBA player said: “ It was frustrating to win championship after championship every year, hear thousands chant my name, and then go to my bedroom to count my change so I could buy a burger.” this is the case for a lot of players

     

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Left
  • Why college athletes should not be paid

    Cartoon of the Week

    Cartoon of the Week 37

  • Why college athletes should not be paid

    Opinion

    La triste realidad sobre el Machismo

  • Why college athletes should not be paid

    Opinion

    Opinion: Setting Pride Week straight

  • Why college athletes should not be paid

    Cartoon of the Week

    Cartoon of the Week 36

  • Why college athletes should not be paid

    Opinion

    Why I hate Christmas

  • Why college athletes should not be paid

    Opinion

    Satire: Trump’s disaster tweets

  • Why college athletes should not be paid

    Opinion

    Opinion: Ventura Unified’s revolving door of superintendents harms students

  • Why college athletes should not be paid

    Opinion

    Foothill Bad Faith Podcast Episode 2: the protester vs. the patriot

  • Why college athletes should not be paid

    Cartoon of the Week

    Cartoon of the Week 35

  • Why college athletes should not be paid

    Cartoon of the Week

    Cartoon of the Week 34

Navigate Right
The Student News Site of Foothill Technology High School
Why college athletes should not be paid