The Foothill Dragon Press

Is album art a relic of the physical age?

Back to Article
Back to Article

Is album art a relic of the physical age?

Credit: Grayson McCoy / The Foothill Dragon Press

Credit: Grayson McCoy / The Foothill Dragon Press

Credit: Grayson McCoy / The Foothill Dragon Press

Credit: Grayson McCoy / The Foothill Dragon Press

Riley Bangs

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

Since the early 1900s, the music industry has been attaching images to their albums as a part of marketing and, to an extent, artistic intent. Since the inception of gatefold covers, album covers themselves were desired for their unique visual format and collectable value. What still remains in question is how an album cover can affect the music, whether or not we listen to it and the emotions that it conveys.

From a marketing perspective, the relevance of an album cover has fallen significantly as streaming becomes more popular than buying CDs or other formats.

“You’re not getting a physical copy anymore,” says Tyler Castro, manager at Salzer’s, a long standing Ventura record store. “It’s just a picture you see and then you push play. It does nothing at all.”

Pop culture icons of the 1900s are so memorable because their faces and pictures would have to be enough to get you to listen. Putting that money down on something tangible probably made listening to it a more fulfilling experience as well.

Album covers that follow an artistic theme or even add to that motif can be hard to find in the modern era. Tame Impala’s “Lonerism” pictures the viewer as being fenced off from society, a visual scape that affixes to the distant, echo chamber synth rock of Impala very well. “Just for a Day’s” flowing dress of an unknown girl captures Slowdive’s shoegaze atmosphere, constantly in motion. These albums put good images to the music, but it’s hard to say whether they are part of the music; if the cover could possibly stand by itself, by its own merits.

Usually, a distinction like this can only be understood from a personal perspective. Swans’ “Various Failures” holds much artistic value for me; both the music and the cover. I believe that the art of an album cover can easily be art on its own, but those who aren’t avid in the subject may not even care about these superficialities.

“It all depends on the music you listen to,” Foothill’s art teacher Justin Frazier said. “Someone buying a Justin Timberlake album isn’t going to be as swayed by the album art.”

Some people don’t want to worry about “what it all means” and just make their ear-holes feel good. This can attribute to the popularity of streaming as well; it is instant music gratification.

In psychology, there is little to no research on the relationship between enjoying music and enjoying the visual art that accompanies it. What has been researched, however, is that visual thinking is the most common form of conception in 60 to 65 percent of the population. It can therefore be reasoned that if a familiar album is mentioned, most will think of the picture first and the music second. For example, when you hear someone talking about “The Dark Side of the Moon,” you think of the iconic light spectrum before anything else.

The problem with this association is that it is not absolute. When thinking of Cake, I couldn’t tell you what “Fashion Nugget” looks like, but instead I would think of songs that I’m most familiar with, like “Frank Sinatra” or “Perhaps, Perhaps, Perhaps.” This is because I like these songs above the album as a whole, and therefore I don’t think of the album as a whole. People nowadays could sing you “Bohemian Rhapsody” start to finish, but few could tell you what album the song originated from.

In the world of having everything, sometimes ‘everything’ gets watered down,” Foothill’s digital photography teacher Cameron Crouch said.

Music and art only brandish as much meaning as we give them. Album covers can be art, but they are not always necessarily art. The clash between the individuality of art appreciation and the shift between streaming and physical copy has me worried for a future where artists don’t bother with the covers anymore. The topic of music to visual association is something that needs to be further researched to highlight its value. However, it can go beyond a push for the brand or a psychological synapse, an album cover can mean something to us.

What do you think?
1 Comment

One Response to “Is album art a relic of the physical age?”

  1. Colin F Boyle on November 16th, 2017 9:53 am

    Riley, I couldn’t agree more! It’s really interesting to see how album art, or even the concept of an album isn’t as integral of a part of music as it used to be; it’s all about singles now, and few people care to listen to an album start to finish ( unless it has Taylor Swift syndrome, where all of the songs are singles ). Personally, I like to collect vinyl records for not just the purpose of memorabilia but also keeping a solid copy, which may not sound like it makes a difference, but actually makes a significant one. Keep writing, what you have to say is definitely interesting!


Comments on articles are screened and those determined by editors to be crude, overly mean-spirited or that serve primarily as personal attacks will not be approved. The Editorial Review Board, made up of 11 student editors and a faculty adviser, make decisions on content.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.

Navigate Left
Navigate Right
The Student News Site of Foothill Technology High School
Is album art a relic of the physical age?