The Foothill Dragon Press

Familial DNA searches are potentially exploitative of people of color

Credit%3A+Jordyn+Savard+%2F+The+Foothill+Dragon+Press
Back to Article
Back to Article

Familial DNA searches are potentially exploitative of people of color

Credit: Jordyn Savard / The Foothill Dragon Press

Credit: Jordyn Savard / The Foothill Dragon Press

Credit: Jordyn Savard / The Foothill Dragon Press

Credit: Jordyn Savard / The Foothill Dragon Press

Sam Bova

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






“Familial” DNA searching is a search by law enforcement in DNA databases for genetic information which would indicate that a relative committed a crime. It is primarily used to identify suspects and exonerate the wrongly convicted.

The ethical dilemma of familial DNA searches is currently under the microscope. The majority of the debate revolves around privacy concerns.

However, this is insignificant next to a factor of DNA searching which doesn’t get as much attention, but is a far more consequential aspect of the debate: This form of testing would likely have a disproportionate, undeserved focus on the African American community.

African Americans comprise less than 13 percent of the U.S. population, but approximately 40 percent of the DNA profiles in the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS). This ties into the fact that African Americans are routinely subjected to suspicious, rude, belligerent and cruel treatment from police. In our society, there remains an implicit bias against people of color that is below the level of conscious decision. People of color are more likely to be stopped, searched and arrested, and this racial profiling carries over into the DNA databases. When an individual is incarcerated for violent crimes, they are required to submit a DNA sample to state and national databases. Because the incarceration rate of African Americans is of such high disparity, the DNA profiles of African Americans constitute an incongruent proportion of the databases.

It follows from this that a significantly higher percentage of African Americans would be identified as suspects through familial DNA searches. This problem persists with the fact that the rate of false positives in past searches has been roughly twice the magnitude for African Americans than that of other racial groups, which continues the trend of the African American community’s lopsided relationship with the justice system.

It can be discerned from this data that the utilization of familial DNA searches would cause people of color to suffer disproportionately from intrusions of privacy and police interrogations. There would be a greater severity of injustices imposed upon marginalized groups from the powers that be. Much of this stems from the long, pernicious reach of unconscious racial bias in America. This country has a tortured racial history existing within its culture and arising from still pervasive inequities; unfortunately, this is frequently unrecognized.

The most prominent form of racism in today’s America is “colorblind racism.” This is essentially the denial of the racial inequalities which exist. It’s the inability or unwillingness to see that the roots of racism continue to permeate our culture regardless of the abolition of slavery or our first black president.

The same idea can be found in the prospect of familial DNA searches. People fail to see the race-related issues these searches would incite. They would prefer to propagate a false image of a nondiscriminatory America. But America’s history with racism is a monstrosity of an evil which has yet to reach absolution. We have to make conscious decisions, taking race into account, to begin to assuage the hundreds of years of oppression people of color have faced in this country.

DNA searches have yet to cause increased exploitation of African Americans; this is a threat to the future unless we prepare for it today by being in opposition to its use.

 

What do you think?
About the Writer
Sam Bova, Writer

Sam Bova is a third year Opinions writer but his opinions are fact and there can be no disagreeing with them.

Leave a Comment

Comments on articles are screened and those determined by editors to be crude, overly mean-spirited or that serve primarily as personal attacks will not be approved. The Editorial Review Board, made up of 11 student editors and a faculty adviser, make decisions on content.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Left
  • Familial DNA searches are potentially exploitative of people of color

    Opinion

    A leader is not defined by their academic success

  • Familial DNA searches are potentially exploitative of people of color

    Cartoon of the Week

    Cartoon of the Week 38

  • Familial DNA searches are potentially exploitative of people of color

    Cartoon of the Week

    Cartoon of the Week 37

  • Familial DNA searches are potentially exploitative of people of color

    Opinion

    La triste realidad sobre el Machismo

  • Familial DNA searches are potentially exploitative of people of color

    Opinion

    Setting Pride Week straight

  • Familial DNA searches are potentially exploitative of people of color

    Columns

    Chang: there is something critically wrong with Foothill’s administration.

  • Familial DNA searches are potentially exploitative of people of color

    Cartoon of the Week

    Cartoon of the Week 36

  • Familial DNA searches are potentially exploitative of people of color

    Opinion

    Why I hate Christmas

  • Familial DNA searches are potentially exploitative of people of color

    Opinion

    Satire: Trump’s disaster tweets

  • Familial DNA searches are potentially exploitative of people of color

    Opinion

    Ventura Unified’s revolving door of superintendents harms students

Navigate Right
The Student News Site of Foothill Technology High School
Familial DNA searches are potentially exploitative of people of color